The Value of Digital Transformation – What Is or Isn't "Tech"

What’s the value of your digital transformation?

This is a question that most large companies struggle with, beyond just the challenge of building a financial model or P&L projection around your changing business.

At a more fundamental level, how will the market value your changing business, given the competitive environment and your new more “digital” self.

When approaching these questions, there’s a tendency to look at tech companies as comparables, particularly fast-growing startups in your industry. In doing so, a lot of vastly different business models often get lumped together, especially if they’re all backed by Silicon Valley.

But public markets tend to see through these superficial comparisons.

The Curious Case of Two IPOs

Two recent IPOs tell an interesting story.

One of the two companies is Blue Apron. Blue Apron was considered a tech company while private, raising money as a startup from Silicon Valley VC’s at valuations that were typical for other tech companies and receiving lots of hype and praise from the traditional tech press.

But when Blue Apron IPO’d last June, public markets told a very different tale. The company is currently trading at a revenue multiple of about 1, with a market cap just under $ 1 billion dollars. Rather than being valued like a tech company, it turns out that public markets value Blue Apron much the same way they would a typical chain of grocery stores.

And if you think about it, that’s really what Blue Apron is: a grocery store with a different user interface and delivery mechanism. Nothing about Blue Apron’s business model really shifts the fundamental economics of the grocery business, which are typically very low.

Now, let’s look at company number two. That company is CarGurus.

This little-known company went public in early October. Cargurus’ revenue was about $ 143 million for the first half of 2017, compared to Blue Apron’s nearly $ 500 million.

Yet Cargurus was valued at a revenue multiple greater than ten. What’s the difference? Cargurus is a platform – a product marketplace to be more precise. Blue Apron is just a digital interface slapped on top of a traditional linear business.

Despite all the hype around Blue Apron ($ 199m raised before IPO) and the lack of it around Cargurus – which had previously raised only one small round of funding – public markets instantly saw the value of Cargurus’ platform business model.

Platform Innovation Creates the Most Value

This comparison is only one example. In our research for Modern Monopolies, we found a similar disparity between linear businesses and platforms when looking at both public companies and startups. But it’s becoming even more clear that simply adding digital or tech to your business will not automatically mean a higher valuation.

For large companies looking at digital transformation, the lesson should be clear. Simply slapping digital on top of your core business is not enough to significantly increase the value of your business. Software alone doesn’t build a defensible moat, and investors know it.

The real value is in creating and growing an external network and building a platform business. Platform innovation is by far the most valuable type of digital transformation.

However, it’s also likely the most difficult. It requires looking at your industry with fresh eyes and understanding how a network can help you build a better and more defensible business than your traditional supply chain.

This is a hard lesson for many big companies to learn. It involves going against much of what has made them successful in the past.

Yet for those who are able to take the leap – as Walmart has done in the last year – platform innovation can pay big dividends.

Tech

Blockchain Startup Digital Asset Raises $40 Million

The startup is funded by some of the world’s largest banks.

Digital Asset, a blockchain startup funded by some of the world’s largest banks, has raised $ 40 million as it expands globally.

The funding round was led by Jefferson River Capital, the family office of Tony James, president and chief operating officer of private equity firm Blackstone, Digital Asset said on Monday.

The round brings the total raised by Digital Asset, which is led by former J.P. Morgan banker Blythe Masters, to $ 110 million.

The company also said it had hired Clyde Rodriguez, a former co-chief technology officer of hedge fund Two Sigma Investments as chief information officer and CTO of engineering.

Blockchain, which first emerged as the software underpinning cryptocurrency bitcoin, is a shared record of transactions that is maintained by a network of computers on the internet.

Related: J.P. Morgan Is Launching a Payments Network Using Blockchain

Financial institutions have been investing millions of dollars in the technology in the hopes that it can help them cut costs and simplify some of their back office processes.

Founded in 2014, New York-based Digital Asset is one of the most high profile startups in the nascent blockchain industry and is focused on developing technology for financial institutions.

The funding will be used mainly to grow the company’s team, which is 130-strong globally, Masters, the company’s CEO, said in an interview. She did not say how many people would be hired, but noted that the team could also grow through acquisitions.

“As we head into 2018 we will seek to grow both to continue the existing projects we are working on to bring them into production and to take on new ones,” Masters said.

Related: IBM and Stellar Are Launching Blockchain Banking Across Multiple Countries

In early 2016 Digital Asset raised more than $ 60 million from large financial institutions including Goldman Sachs Group gs , J.P. Morgan Chase & Co jpm , CME Group, Deutsche Boerse and Citigroup c .

Digital Asset’s clients include Australian stock exchange ASX, also an investor, and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation.

The ASX is assessing whether to use Digital Asset’s technology to replace its clearing and settlement system, which would constitute one of the most ambitious blockchain projects yet. It is set to make a decision in December.

While Digital Asset has focused on using its technology in financial markets, Masters said the company would not exclude other sectors in the future.

“I wouldn’t rule it out because the technology lends itself, but we are very focused on what is not a small market segment,” Masters said.

Tech

EU ready to move alone on digital tax if no global deal

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – The European Commission said the EU should proceed with an overhaul of taxes on digital firms even if the rest of the rich world did not follow suit, a draft report said.

The document is part of an EU push to tap more revenues from online multinationals such as Amazon and Facebook, who are accused of paying too little tax in Europe by routing most of their profits to low-rate countries such as Ireland or Luxembourg.

The draft report, to be adopted on Thursday, said that on average brick-and-mortar multinationals pay in taxes in the EU more than twice what their digital competitors do.

Traditional large firms face a median 23.2 percent tax rate, while digital giants do not pay more than 10.1 percent – and when they sell directly to customers, rather than to firms, their effective rate goes down to 8.9 percent, data cited by the Commission showed.

An earlier report by a European lawmaker said EU states may have lost in tax revenues up to 5.4 billion euros ($ 6.5 billion) just from Facebook and Google, now part of Alphabet, between 2013 and 2015.

“A level playing field is a pre-condition for all businesses to be able to innovate, develop and grow,” the Commission said, adding that fairer taxation of the digital economy was urgently needed.

Partly because of the uneven taxation, revenues in the EU retail sector grew on average by only 1 percent a year between 2008 and 2016, while in the same period revenues of the top-five online retailers, such as Amazon, grew on average by 32 percent per year, the Commission’s report says.

NEXT STEPS

The document, seen by Reuters, will be presented at a summit of EU leaders on September 29 dedicated to digital issues. Despite divergences and scepticism among some smaller states, the 28 EU countries are expected to find common ground on digital taxation by December.

The Commission is seeking a compromise among rich countries worldwide in a bid to reduce opposition from EU states that fear losing competitiveness if the EU moves ahead on its own in this field.

But “in the absence of adequate global progress, EU solutions should be advanced within the single market”, the document said, adding that a legislative proposal may be presented in the spring regardless of global developments.

The best way to tackle distortions would be to review the notion of “permanent establishment” so that firms could be taxed also in countries where they do not have a physical presence, the Commission said.

At the moment online companies can often avoid paying taxes in countries where they generate large revenues because they do not have a physical presence there.

A proposal to change the corporate tax base is already under discussion in the EU. The Commission believes it represents “a basis to address these key challenges”, but needs the unanimous support of EU states to turn the plan into law.

To move ahead more quickly, the Commission said short-term solutions could be considered. They include an “equalization” tax on turnover, as proposed by France and backed by 10 EU countries, the report said.

Alternative short-term options would be a withholding tax on payments to digital businesses and a levy on revenues from advertisements or other services provided by digital firms.

But short-term options “have pros and cons, and further work is needed”, the Commission said, warning that they may go against double-taxation treaties, state aid rules, fundamental freedoms and EU international commitments under free trade agreements and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Reporting by Francesco Guarascio @fraguarascio; Editing by Philip Blenkinsop and Gareth Jones

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Tech